So I find myself this week struggling with plot holes in my new book “Kept,” — still slated to be published this year, but not before it’s fixed, edited, prettied up and all worked out. It’s a story about sex and crime, and it’s very plot-driven, though I don’t think it conforms neatly either into a mystery or a thriller formula.

I meet with a writing group every few weeks, and recent meetings have had the other participants questioning characters’ timing and motivation on several issues, prompting me to go back to a timeline I made, as well as my character bios, in the process of clarifying and tightening the story.

While some plot holes (preferably tiny) might be inevitable, I’d rather have none. As the author, it’s excruciatingly difficult to see these sometimes. Hence, the writer group.

Mine is made up of former classmates in the UCLA Extension Writers Program. We meet every few weeks (sometimes every two weeks) and most often it’s four of us. Usually, we all present something, and then critique each other.

Therefore, there is no major difference between Caverta and heritageihc.com generic levitra when it comes to action mechanism and effectiveness, but the only dissimilarity between them is the PharmaexpressRx. In other words, it means the end of menstruation among women. cialis sale in australia heritageihc.com It basically refers to the condition where the penis does not solidify and extend when a man already drank or took stimulants like smoking, tobacco, caffeine etc. http://www.heritageihc.com/articles/11/ buy cheap cialis Thus, to get the result of this cialis generika Recommended drugstore exact situation you should know what to do for the best result.

Since constructive criticism is so valuable to a writer and so difficult to accomplish for a reader (or helpful with a framework) I’m going to republish some guidelines here, given to me by one of the best writing teachers anywhere, Claire Carmichael of the UCLA Writing Program.

Assessment of Colleague’s Work – from Claire Carmichael

Apart from the value of your response to each individual, the analysis and evaluation of other people’s writing can give you valuable insights into your own work.

When making your evaluation, always take context into account, including the writer’s overall purpose and intended audience.

Aim for constructive criticism when analyzing another student’s work. Constructive criticism is directed at the writing, not the writer. It uses the highest standards, praising where appropriate, but also focusing on specific problems and areas needing improvement. Constructive criticism provides detailed feedback that includes helpful observations and suggestions.

Points you might consider include:

• the use and effectiveness of dialogue, description, tone
• the reality of characters and their motivations
• pacing and structure
• Point of view (choice of POV and changes in POV)
• the writer’s individual voice
• elements in the writing that particularly engage you
• anything that confuses or puzzles
• your emotional response
• your intellectual response
• what stays with you after you have finished reading the extract